03 July, 2015

The Semenya puzzle

Caster Semenya burst upon the athletics world in 2009 when she won the World championships over 800 m with a blazing 1:55.45. Previously unknown, her only participation at a major international event was that of the 2008 World junior championships where she did not progress beyond the heats. Her best 2008 performance was a respectable 2:04.23, registered in October.

I will not discuss the almost 10 seconds’ leap from 2:04 to 1:55 in just a few months. Things like that may happen (although they are extremely unlikely) in particular with young athletes. What has always been bothering me was the fact that not only Semenya was looking like a man




but most probably feeling like a man, if one judges by the choice of her attire. 




The story is known. After her victory at the 2009, Berlin, World championships, there has been an outcry of the other competitors claiming that Semenya was a man. Given the importance of the matter the IAAF decided to investigate but this resulted to Semenya being allowed to participate in women’s races. However the medical details of the case remain confidential. Other sources did not hesitate to piece together what is known in the Semenya gender case, based on sources closely related to the official test. Semenya has both male and female sexual characteristics. She has no womb or ovaries and has (undescended) testes, causing her to have triple the levels of testosterone of other female athletes.

Does this mean that Semenya is a man?

Gender testing is really complicated. At the beginning, let’s say the 60s when serious gender testing was established, gender testing was essentially based on anatomy. Of course this is a first but clearly insufficient step. So, chromosomal testing was introduced and it was accurate in most cases. Most but not all, unfortunately. While in most cases having an XX profile means that you were a woman there were cases where somebody with an XY profile could have female genitalia. The condition is known as the Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. It is due to the fact that the gene for male foetal development did not work properly and thus both male and female genitalia did develop. While in this case male hormones are not produced at quantities which would have been normal for men they may be present in excess to what is normal for women. Still, the IOC has decided that athletes who have the CAIS syndrome should be considered as female. So, although we do not know for sure whether her case is the one just described, Semenya is allowed to participate to competitions as a woman.

Why does this business bother me?

Since that 2009 victory, Semenya has participated at two other major competitions, the 2011 World’s and the 2012 Olympics finishing second each time. I remember the commentary of Colin Jackson on the 2012 olympic race. He was convinced that Semenya threw the race. Having watched a number of times the video of the race I am convinced of the same. Perhaps after the 2009 outcry Semenya has settled for places of honour in order to provoke fewer reactions. If this were the case, and the probability is not zero, I, for one, would be deeply disappointed by the current state of athletics and the laxity of the governing bodies. 

I am afraid that there is no solution to the Semenya mystery. The most recent piece of the puzzle is the announcement (later refuted) that Semenya got officially engaged to her girlfriend, fellow runner, Violet Raseboya.



There is also a rumour that Semenya has been compelled to take hormones in order to keep her testosterone levels within an acceptable range but has never been confirmed. On the other hand the most recent photos of Semenya present a slightly more feminine figure. However this can be easily arranged by other means. 


So, is Caster Semenya a man or a woman? I do not know. Should she be allowed to run as a woman? I would be tempted to say no, but I will reserve my verdict for after the 2015, Beijing, World championships. If Semenya, after a series of lacklustre performances over the past two years, manages to win another medal, that would definitely mean that there is something very fishy going on.

03 June, 2015

I could not believe my eyes

I was looking up athlete’s results at the IAAF’s athletes’ page and I ended up on Al Oerter’s page. And there I had a major shock. You can see for yourselves.


The Tokyo, 1964, Olympics result has simply disappeared. I could easily understand a blank page, like the one for Jesse Owens, where no result whatsoever is given. One can interpret this as a page under construction (although the more I think about this the more I find it unforgivable). But having decided to present the data on one of the greatest athletes of all times they should have done it correctly. We are talking about the official site of the International Association of Athletics Federations, not some fan maintained page.

(In case you were wondering: the four olympic victories of “king” Carl in long jump do appear correctly in his respective page on the IAAF site).

01 June, 2015

More on the Kenteris-Thanou scandal

I run across an article reporting on an interview of the lawyer of Kenteris and Thanou, Michalis Dimitrakopoulos, who represented the two greek athletes in their trial for the supposedly staged motorcycle accident of 2004. 

Kenteris and, on the right, Dimitrakopoulos

Dimitrakopoulos made clear that the two athletes had not ben acquitted because of the talent of their lawyer but because the report of the coroners was that their injuries could only be attributed to a traffic accident. And he added that the whole scandal has been a craftily fabricated one. Since the Games were held in Greece the local athletes did not have an obligation to reside in the Olympic Village. However somebody (a quisling, says Dimitrakopoulos, using the greek version of the expression, “efialtis”) announced that Kenteris and Thanou will be living at the Olympic Village so that once they had left they would be in violation of their “whereabout”. The rest is history. Both greek athletes paid a most heavy price, Kenteris ending his career in 2004 and Thanou attempting a come-back in 2007 found herself excluded from the 2008 Olympics.

I do not know what to think of this story. Perhaps one day we’ll know the truth. However I recall perfectly well an interview of Carl Lewis (yes, “king” Carl again) in 2004 in Athens, a few days prior to the Olympics, where Kenteris figured as the number one favourite for the 200 m, in which Lewis, in his usual dismissive manner, made clear that Kenteris did not have a chance at another olympic medal. At that moment I knew that something was brewing, something that was meant to take Kenteris out of the action. As I have already written there is a non-zero probability that both athletes had at the time used forbidden substances (although no proof of this does exist). Still, the way they were brought down was really petty. And I like the story of the “efialtis”. It is a 100 % greek story: all along our history, from the most ancient times till today, we excel at producing traitors.