31 October, 2023

Deji Ogeyingbo is rewriting the history of Athletics

I have already posted about RunBlogRun, a blog curated by Larry Eder, active since 2007, publishing dozens of articles each month. I am regularly visiting the blog and I find many of its articles quite interesting.

Unfortunately today I was in for a great disappointment. While perusing RunBlogRun I stumbled upon an article on S.A. Fraser-Pryce. As the faithful readers of my blog know, I am not a Fraser-Pryce fan. And the existing infatuation with the "pocket rocket" raises my hackles. I decided to read the article that was about Fraser-Pryce's injuries and how they may compromise a bid for a third gold medal over 100 m in the Paris Olympics. 


A parenthesis is necessary here. Fraser-Pryce won the Olympics for the last time in 2012. She won the world title in 2019 and 2022 and has more gold medals than anybody else in the 100 m event. But when it comes to the Olympics one should not forget that it was E. Thompson who won the title in 2016 and 2020 (well, 2021). So, given the fact that in Budapest, despite an explosive start, Fraser-Pryce could offer no resistance to S. Jackson and S. Richardson, I don't see how one can consider her seriously as a contender for a gold medal in Paris. (But then this position of mine is perhaps due to the fact that I am not a Fraser-Pryce fan).

But it's not the talk about the olympic chances of Fraser-Pryce that is setting my teeth on edge. It's a sentence in the article that I find insulting to the great women champions of the past.

Deji Ogeyingbo, a Nigerian T&F Journalist and frequent contributor to RunBlogRun, decided to rewrite the history of Athletics. The alternative would be that he simply ignores that history, but I cannot believe that somebody who presents himself as an athletics specialist can ignore such basic facts. Anyhow, one reads in the article that Fraser-Pryce was the first woman to win back-to-back olympic titles in the 100 m. Nothing is further from the truth. Not only Fraser-Pryce is not the first, but she is not even the second.  

World Athletics published an article entitled "Wyomia Tyus: Still fighting for recognition as the first back-to-back Olympic 100 m champion". The opening lines of that article are great.

Quick: Name the first athlete to win the 100 m at consecutive Olympic Games.

Carl Lewis? Wrong.

Usain Bolt? Nope.

The first person – man or woman – to accomplish the feat was Wyomia Tyus, the US sprinter who unexpectedly won gold at the 1964 Tokyo Games and successfully defended her title four years later in Mexico City.

And yet, more than half a century later, Tyus’s place in Olympic history as the first back-to-back 100 m champion is often overlooked.

Her feat has by now been replicated by C. Lewis (but as we know he obtained the 1988 title due to the disqualification of B. Johnson, while himself having been the recipient of an, at the time, prohibited substance), G. Devers, S.A. Fraser-Pryce, U. Bolt, and E. Thompson-Herah. But even if we limit ourselves to the women olympians, one cannot ignore the two victories of G. Devers in 1992 and 1996.

So, why did Mr. Ogeyingbo do this blunder? I am afraid that there is a certain hagiographical tendency when it comes to S.A. Fraser-Pryce. This is partly due to the way she is promoting the image of herself. But the facts are there and she is definitely not the first woman to win the gold medal in consecutive Olympics in the 100 m event. As for her Paris chances? Well, as you may have guessed, she is definitely not my favourite.

22 October, 2023

The World Athletics choice of the year's best

World Athletics published their list of the best athletes of the year. As always, some names appear in both my list and the WA one. Of course, my list is based on my preferences and thus subjective. And I am convinced that the one of World Athletics is not totally objective either. Here is the list of the ten best men according to WA. 


Neeraj Chopra
Ryan Crouser
Mondo Duplantis
Soufiane El Bakkali
Jakob Ingebrigtsen
Kelvin Kiptum
Pierce LePage
Noah Lyles
Alvaro Martin
Miltiadis Tentoglou
Karsten Warholm

It is not possible to establish the overlap between the two lists, since this year WA decided to produce a list of 11 instead of the usual 10 (and I for once decided to limit y choice to strictly 10). 

The ones present in my list and absent from the WA one are G. Tamberi, J. Cheptegei and E. Kipchoge. Their place in the WA list is occupied by K. Kiptum, (who established a new and impressive world record in the marathon), S. El Bakkali (the steeple-chase champion), K. Warholm and A. Martin. The latter won the world titles over the 20 and the 35 km race-walking events. Since I do not like this discipline I am not including its protagonists in my year's best list (although I am convinced that they are excellent athletes). The only exception was the inclusion (for obvious reasons) of the greek champion, A. Drisbioti, who won the two titles in last year's Europeans.

And here is the women's list

Tigist Assefa
Femke Bol
Shericka Jackson
Faith Kipyegon
Haruka Kitaguchi
Yaroslava Mahuchikh
Maria Perez
Gudaf Tsegay
Sha’Carri Richardson
Yulimar Rojas
Winfed Yavi

Four athletes of my list, I. Vuleta, K. Nageotte, S. Hassan and P. Jepchirchir are absent from the WA list. The ones present are T. Assefa (who recently established a new world record in the marathon), H. Kitaguchi (javelin world champion, but still far from the performances of the great throwers of the past decades), Y. Rojas (who once more dominated triple jump, but who was, to my eyes, less convincing this year) G. Tsegay (who established a great world record over 5000 m and would appear in my list, had I proposed 11 names) and M. Perez. What I wrote for A. Martin applies also to M. Perez. And in fact these double victories will be addressed in some future post of mine (where, you guessed it, I will be once more criticising race-walking).

The five finalists will be announced on November 13-14. I do not know if I will publish a special article in order to give the finalists list. Perhaps I will just amend this post putting a star next to the five chosen names, in which case, if you wish to keep abreast of the selection process, please revisit this post in mid-November.

13 October, 2023

My choice of the year's best athletes

It's this time of the year. World Athletics will be publishing soon their list of candidates for the athlete of the year title (most probably the list will be out by the time I publish this article) and thus I must hurry and present my own.


Faith Kipyegon is, to my eyes the undisputable favourite for the year's best athlete. She has dominated the middle distances and only at the very end of the season was she beaten in an event in which she has no experience (road running). While her world record races in the 1500 m and the mile were great, the one I prefer was the world championships 5000 m final. And since Tsegay did not manage to break the 14 min barrier in the 5000 m, when she recovered the world record that had previously been nabbed by Kipyegon, I look forward to the latter to be the first woman running a sub-14 5000 m next year.

I like partcularly this photo of S. Jackson as she reminds me M. Ottey

Shericka Jackson is the best versatile female sprinter. With personal bests at 10.70 , 21.41 and 49.47 s she has been the dominant figure in women's sprint. She has the 5 out of the 10 best performances in 200 m and if anybody can break Flo-Jo's 200 m haunted record, that's Jackson. She is number two in my list and I would have considered her for first place had she not lost the world title over 100 m.


Adding the outdoors world title to her indoor long jump ones, is for me sufficient for a position in the top three for Ivana Vuleta. She is an athlete I have been following throughout the years and I have always been appreciating the purity of her style. I just hope that she will be able to crown her career with a medal in next year's Olympics.

F. Bol was the best low hurdler of the year. She dominated the discipline and it would have been very interesting to see what she could do agaist S. McLaughlin. I look forward to such a duel in Paris, next year.

Y. Mahuchikh rebounded from last year's defeat and secured the women's high jump world title. What could have happened weren't M. Lasitskene excluded from international competitions (thanks to the unwarranted decisions of Lord Sebastian), nobody can tell. But, for the time being, Mahuchikh is the number one high jumper (although the australian duo, Patterson and Olyslagers, are there to challenge her at every step of the way).

S. Richardson was the surprise winner for the women's 100 m world title. The surprise has nothing to do with Richardson talent but more with the fact that she was barely qualified to the final. Given the mastery she displayed in the relay's final I think that she is worth a place in my top ten.

K. Nageotte has been dominating the women's pole vault for the last years. In Budapest she added a second world title to her palmarès. And given her attitude at the end of the breath-taking event in this year's World's, I will not be astonished if she were proposed for the fair-play prize.

I have been following W. Yavi for years, being convinced of her great talent. She not only confirmed this in Budapest but she went on to win the final of the Diamond League despite the presence of the great B. Chepkoech.

S. Hassan lost the 10000 m world title due to a unlucky moment. And then, after a season devoted to track events, she went on to win her second marathon, in a time that, just two weeks earlier, would have been a world record. 

P. Jepchirchir is definitely the half-marathon specialist, but this did not prevent her from winning the olympic title in the (full) marathon event. Her third victory in the event, this last month, wins her a place in my top-ten list.


Mondo Duplantis has been at the top of my list last year (and also in the 2020 one). Well, what can one do? When in presence of such a great talent who, at just 23 years of age, has rewritten the history of pole vault there is only one place for him: once more at the number one of my choice of the years best athletes. It will be interesting to see if World Athletics will award him back-to-back titles, since Duplantis was the recipient of last year's award.


Noah Lyles
was the leading figure in men's sprint this year. While a 200 m specialist (which he dominated despite the presence of great young talents, E. knighton and L. Tebogo), he decided to compete in the 100 m as well and did win the world title. And then he went on to win a third gold medal anchoring the 4x100 m US relay. This earns him the second place in my year's best classification.


And for the third place I choose none other than Miltos Tentoglou who at just 25 years of age has won everything: olympic, world, european out- and indoor titles. His unique self-control in Budapest allowed him to win the only medal missing from his collection. 

R. Grouser is transforming the men's shot put. He has 13 out of the best 20 throws in history. To my eyes he is the thrower who can breach the 24 m barrier. He has already figured on the podium of my year's best athletes (in 2021).

N. Chopra added the world title to his olympic one and that sufficed for me in order to include him in my top ten. One thing I am looking forward to from him is a 90+ performance. 

G. Tamberi was absent till now from top lists (but he got a special mention in 2021). This year, after he had won the world title, I felt that it was time to include him in the list. He is a great athlete, a unique showman and an example for his courage, having rebounded from a serious injury and reaching the world summit. 

The regular readers of my blog know that I am a great fan of combined events. This time the name of the decathlon is P. LePage. He had a great competition in Budapest  finishing among the first in most events and winning the world title with more than 100 points to spare.

J. Ingebrigtsen lost once again the world title of the 1500 m. Had he won it he could have made the top three in my classification (although that would have meant pushing Tentoglou out, which I would have been reluctant to do). Still He had a great year and my gut feeling is that the 1500 m world record will not survive for much longer.

J. Cheptegei won his third straight title for men's 10000 m. The olympic title is still missing and, if all goes well for him, he will go for it in Paris. But for the time being he is worth a place among my top ten.

I have saved the great E. Kipchoge for last. Just a few weeks ago he won for the fifth time the Berlin marathon. Although he did not break his world record this time (and in fact saw this become property of K. Kiptum a few days later), Kipchoge has a place among the top ten, just as last year and the year before that.

As last year I will publish the rising star list separately. World Athletics decided last year to split the two lists and I am following suit.

07 October, 2023

The blog is 10 years old

Ten years ago I decided to publish a blog on athletics. That idea came while reading A. Juilland's book "Rethinking Track and Field". Juilland main argument is that we must change the way we are doing athletics if we wish to make the discipline again attractive to spectators. I also felt that athletics needed changes (and that World Athletics was too timorous to implement revolutionary ones) and decided to present my ideas in a series of blog articles. As a tribute to the genius of Juilland, I decided to plagiarise the title of his book. 

The blog evolved, as every living entity does, and, over the years, became something I could not have predicted from the outset. As I could never have predicted that after ten years it would be alive and thriving. I have published more than 400 different articles and the blog has been visited 227 thousand times. Now, the statistics of this are somewhat curious. From time to time there is a spurt of visits that I have trouble explaining. At the end of August there was one day with almost 6 thousand visits. Was that an effect of the World Championships? Anyhow, I consider that a thousand visits per month is the normal traffic for the blog and I am happy when the number of visitors reaches four figures.

Some posts have been consistently popular. The champion of visibility is my post entitled "The javelin controversy" with 7.2 thousand visits. Then comes "Pole vault: before and after" with 5.7 k and "Before the olympic medals: the olive wreath" with 3.6 k. In between there is the post "Before the curtain falls: a jaunt into gerontology" which has garnered 6.9 k visitors, but I don't think those were athletics fans. More probably it was the word "gerontology" that triggered the search engines and oriented people towards my article. (I just hope they read it: it's a good one). Speaking about good articles, I am frustrated that one of the best pieces I have ever written "Eleven wretched women, or how fake news almost killed women athletics" has had only 182 visits. The article tells the story of the women's 800 m at the Amsterdam, 1928, Olympics and how a bunch of stupid, dishonest, sexist journalists almost killed women athletics. (If you haven't read it, do it now). This article spurred a whole series I published on the "The long and arduous road of women to the Olympics", complemented by the "Gallery of Shame" where I present the portraits of those who did whatever was possible to thwart the women's efforts to join competitive sports.

Every year, at the anniversary of the blog's creation, I write a short article and end it by asking the question of where I am going to go from here. Ten years look like a good cycle (and way longer that what I could have imagined ten years ago). So I could stop publishing the blog here, settle back and admire the work done. But the fact is that I like writing this blog and I would be really frustrated if it were to end at this point. So, as long as my health allows it, I will continue writing the blog, be it only for my personal pleasure and that of the bunch of my faithful readers. 

01 October, 2023

The World Championships 2023: jumps and throws

I have written a special article on Tentoglou's victory at the championships. As I explained there, Tentoglou almost did not make it to the final: after the two first attempts he was sitting at the 13th place. Fortunately he kept his cool and qualified with his third jump at 8.25 m. But the qualifiers had several victims, among them Shreesankar, who was 7th at last year's World's and has a 8.41 m personal best, to say nothing of the young talents M. Furlani and B. Saraboyukov. And in the final a minor surprise was the below-par performance of S. Ehammer who could not make it to the final 8.

The regular readers of this blog know that I am a great fan of I. Vuleta (Spanovic). For me, she is the best female long jumper of the past decade. She has a perfect style and now that she is able to produce regularly 7+ m jumps she is accumulating gold medals. The qualifications saw J. Sawyers, M. Bekh-Romanchuk, Q. Burks, M. Gardasevic and M. Vicente eliminated. In the final Vuleta opened with a foul at 7+ m and T. Davis-Woodhall took the lead with 6.91 m (which was enough for silver). But at the second jump already Vuleta showed that she was going for the gold with 7.05 m. And she consolidated her place with a 7.14 m jump at her fifth attempt. E. Brume was 3rd up to the last jump but then A. Rotaru-Kottmann pushed her out of the medals with a 6.88 m jump. L. Iapichino, following in the steps of her mother, F. May, was fifth, a net improvement over her last year's performance in Eugene. There was a minor drama in the final with, as protagonist, A. Smith. But this is a story I will tell in some other article of mine. 


There was also some drama in the men's triple jump. P. Pichardo being absent due to injury, the main favourite was 18 years old jamaican jumper J. Hibbert. He qualified with a 17.70 m (which would have sufficed for gold in the final). But then he got injured in his very first jump, which he could not complete, and had to be carried out of the stadium. Following this the way was clear for H.F. Jango who won his first world title with a 17.64 m jump, succeeding thus his coach T. Tamgho who had won the world title in 2013.

Women's triple jump almost turned into a huge surprise. The indisputable favourite, Y. Rojas, world champion in the past three editions, started the competition by fouling a 15+ m jump and then had two bizarre jumps at 14.33 and 14.26 m. But she got lucky. K. Orji had just one valid jump at 14.33 m and so, thanks to her 14.26, Rojas could progress for the final three attempts as 8th. And she went on to foul her next two jumps. I had to, a posteriori, peruse the livestream of the women's triple jump in order to follow Rojas' efforts. In fact her fouled jumps were one at around 15.20 m and one at slightly over 15 m.  So entering the last attempt Rojas was sitting at 8th place while M. Bekh-Romanchuk was first with 15.00 m, L. Pérez-Hernandez second with 14.96 m and T. Lafond third with 14.90 m. And then Rojas had a valid jump at 15.08 m ending the suspense and winning her fourth world title. S. Ricketts jumped 14.93 m at her sixth attempt but that was no more sufficient for a medal.

Barshim and Tamberi carrying Barshim's young son

Two years ago G. Tamberi and M. Barshim shared an olympic gold in Tokyo for men's high jump at 2.37 m, not missing a single attempt up to that height. Last year Barshim was alone at the highest position on the podium winning the world title with 2.37 m, Tamberi losing the bronze medal on countback. This year the outcome was different. It started with a big scare for Tamberi who needed three tries at 2.28 m in order to qualify for the final. However once in the final he had an (almost) exemplary competition winning with 2.36 m before two tries at 2.38 and one at 2.40 m. J. Harrison was leading up to 2.33 m but missing the first try at 2.36 m lost the first place on countback (but this was still a redemption after his failure last year in Eugene, where he had finished 9th). Barshim, curiously, had three unsuccessful attempts at 2.36 m and had to content himself with bronze. 

Last year in Eugene, E. Patterson beat Y. Mahuchikh, for the women's high jump world title, on countback with 2.02 m while Valortigara obtained bronze with 2.00 m beating I. Herashchenko on countback. This year Patterson was not at top shape having been injured in the off season. Still she fought all the way to 1.99 m, beating her compatriot N. Olyslagers on countback. Y. Mahuchikh was already leading at that height but she went on to pass 2.01 m before three unsuccessful attempts at 2.07 m. 

There was no surprise at the men's pole vault. There were five athletes at 5.90 m and still four at 5.95 m. When the bar was raised to 6.00 m Duplantis passed at the first attempt while E. Obiena needed two. The competition was essentially over at that point: Duplantis went on to pass 6.05 and 6.10 m, Obiena failing once at the first height and twice at the second. Then the bar was raised to a potential world record of 6.23 m but Duplantis could not make it. (Less than a month latter he would succeed at that height in the same venue as the 2022 World's). 

Duplantis jumping 6.23 m at the Diamond League final (after the championships)

K. Moon, still under her maiden's name of Nageotte, won last year's world title, S. Morris finishing second and N. Kennedy third.  This year the event started with a (minor) surprise of the non-qualification of K. Stefanidi who no-heighted at 4.50 m. The final saw S. Morris exiting at  4.65 m for a 7th place. At 4.80 m there were just four athletes left. W. Murto won bronze on countback from T. Sutej at that height, while K. Moon and N. Kennedy went on to pass 4.85 and 4.90 m, the latter at the third attempt. Having both just one miss at some previous height they were tied at first position. and, following the Tamberi-Barshim Tokyo example they decided, after a short friendly discussion, to stop there and share the gold. That was one of the great moments of the championships, and, to my eyes, a display of fair-play.


C. Ealey won the women's shot put world title, just as she did last year in Eugene, with a 20.43 m throw. S. Mitton was second with a 20.08 m thrown while L. Gong managed to obtain a medal with 19.69 m on countback from A. Dongmo. The latter is probably the last of the elite glider throwers since women, have followed the example of men and became in their quasi-totality spinners. M. Ewen who has the world leading performance this year with 20.45 m, could do no better than 6th, a minor disappointment.

R. Crouser led the men's shot put competition from the outset. L. Fabbri obtained silver with a 22.34 m throw in his third attempt. T. Walsh was third with 22.05 m up to the fifth throw when J. Kovacs passed him with 22.12 m. When the last throw came nothing changed and Crouser free from any tension managed a great throw of 23.51 m at just 5 cm from hi world record.


Women's hammer throw was a tad sad with the elimination of the quadruple world champion A. Wlodarczyk in the qualifiers. (Last years world champion B. Andersen was also eliminated at the qualification stage). C. Rogers won the final with 77.22 m ahead of J. Kassanavoid both upgrading their medals with respect to Eugene, while D. Price, the 2019 champion, was back on the podium obtaining the bronze medal.

The men's hammer saw a, mostly unknown, 21 years old E. Katzberg lead the qualifiers with 81.18 m. Such surprises are not rare in the qualification competition but, usually, the exceptional performances are not confirmed in the final. Well, in this case the situation was different. Five-time world champion P. Fajdek opened with a season best 80.00 m but in the end that performance was not good for a medal. B. Halasz took the lead with 80.82 m, and, in the end, that would be the only medal (a bronze) for the host nation. W. Nowicki passed him at the fourth attempt throwing just one cm further and in the fifth he increased his lead with 81.02 m. But at this point Katzberg reposted with 81.25 clinching the gold medal. Nobody could react at the last throw and Katzberg confirmed his supremacy with a 81.11 m last throw. Now we have to see how he fares in the future.

Last year V. Allman and S. Perkovic lost the women's discus throw gold medal to what I have dubbed a "lucky throw" by B. Feng. This year the nightmarish, for the favourites, scenario was repeated with L. Tausaga throwing a massive personal best 69.49 m in the fifth round and taking the lead. Allman could not improve her 69.23 m and had to settle for silver. B. Feng confirmed her progress with 68.20  for bronze, while S. Perkovic finished fifth. In my article "What is happening to the US throwers?" I had written about Tausaga pointing out that she managed to throw beyond the 64.20 m qualifying standard on her very last throw, securing thus a place in the team. Admittedly she is a rather young thrower but she has been throwing around 64 m since 2019. A 5 m jump in performance is more than surprising. Let's see if she confirms this next year. 

After his 4th place last year in Eugene one could think that D. Stahl's return at the top of the men's discus hierarchy was impossible. All the more so since K. Ceh and M. Alekna had given proof of their talent, winning the World and European titles respectively. The competition in Budapest started with nobody reaching the automatic qualifying standard. But when the final arrived there were plenty of great throws. Ceh took command of the event with 69.27 m but in the fourth round Stahl passed him with barely 10 cm to spare. Alekna secured the third place with 68.85 . And then came the last throw. Ceh and Stahl were the last two to throw starting with Ceh. And he threw a massive 70.02 m taking the lead. But Stahl had not said his last word. He responded with a championships record of 71.46 m and the gold was his. I expected him to do his short celebration sprint but apparently he is past this phase: is he becoming blasé to his victories?

In the women's javelin the two young throwers I am following, E. Tzengko and A. Vilagos, winners of the European U23 and U20 titles respectively, had a disastrous competition at the qualifiers and were out of the final. The latter started with a lucky throw of 65.47 m by F.D. Ruiz Hurtado (she has not thrown beyond 63 m in the past six years) and with this performance she led the event till the last throw when H. Kitaguchi managed a throw of 66.73 m obtaining gold (she was outside the medals up to that point). K.L. Barber the 2019 and 2022 world champion could do no better than 7th.

Before talking about the javelin competition I would like to show you a short gif showing the portuguese thrower L. Ramos and his special somersault at the end of the throw. He is a young 24-year-old thrower with a 84.78 m record. I would be following him in the future to see if his technique will allow him to reach world-class performances.

The men's javelin throw saw the elimination of ex-world champions J. Yego and A. Peters, while K. Walcott was absent due to injury. (One wonders what happened to the great german trio of J. Vetter, T. Roehler and A. Hoffman who should have been present and dominating the event. I cross my finders hoping to see them back to top shape in some near future). N. Chopra won the event with 88.17 m but that was not a easy victory since A. Nadeem threw 87.82 obtaining silver with that throw. What was really surprising was the presence of three indian throwers in the final finishing 1st (Chopra), 5th (Jena) and 6th (Manu) the last two with throws over 84 m. 


For those who are wondering how come indians start distinguishing themselves in this discipline, the answer is simple. The preferred pastime of indian boys is cricket. So once you become good at throwing the cricket ball, graduating to the javelin is just a matter of assimilating the technique. (Let us not forget that A. Vilagos came to javelin after having distinguished herself as a young girl in throwing the vortex. If you do not know what the latter is you can look it up in google). And of course the argument about indian throwers applies equally to pakistanis, like Nadeem. They have the same passion for cricket.